JOIN
 Match Editorials
Marathon Match 4
08.09.2006 - 08.16.2006

by lbackstrom
TopCoder Member

BattleshipGame

Most of us have played the classic game of Battleship. I'd always viewed it as mostly a game of luck but, while the element of luck can't be denied, this competition proved that some strategies are much better than others.

Of course, this game was also a bit more complicated than regular Battleship, since it allowed multiple shots in one turn. This meant that a good solution would need to do a good job of interpreting the results of the previous shots, and then pick where to fire next.

For the first part, most solutions tried to infer as much information as possible about the possible locations of each of the ships. The board was small enough that a simple approach was fast enough to give good results: iterate over all possible locations where each ship could be, and for each location check to see if that location is consistent with the outcomes of the shots fired so far.

This gives us quite a bit of information about the locations of the ships, but of course it doesn't always make all possible inferences. A slightly better approximation could be made by iterating over all locations for all pairs of ships, or all triples of ships, etc. Of course, the more types of inferences one tries to make, the longer and more complicated things get. Furthermore, there are diminishing returns as one tries to make more complicated inferences. In practice, most competitors did nothing more complex than looking at one ship at a time, and then marking locations as used if there was only one possible location for a ship.

Once one has a good idea of where ships are, the next thing is to figure out where to shoot. Again, a simple strategy worked well: find the spots most likely to have ships, and shoot them. To find the spots that likely have ships, we can look at all the possible locations for each ship, and compute a probability for each square on the grid. So, if a ship could be in 1 of 10 positions, the probability for each of those locations is 0.1, and each cell covered by each of those positions gets 0.1. We add up over all positions, so some cells, which are covered by multiple positions will have probability greater than 0.1.

This gives us probabilities for every cell, for every ship, and from that we can compute the probabilities for just the cells:
1 - (1-p1) (1-p2) (1-p3) ...
Then, we can just pick the highest probability cells.

This simple solution (keep track of possible ship locations, fire at high probability spots) gives us a pretty good score, but to win we need to do a little bit more. There are lots of little tweaks we can make to both stages to get marginal improvement, but it turned out that the key to the winner's solution was to just add a bit of randomness in the shooting stage. After computing the probabilities for each cell, this solution didn't just shoot at the k locations with the highest probability (where k is the maximum number of shots). Instead, it added a little bit of randomness to the probabilities, and then picked the top k.

While this doesn't seem like it should make a big difference at first, it has a few nice properties. First off, the randomness helps us break ties randomly, so we don't end up doing something like breaking ties by grid location. More importantly, however, it prevents us from wasting too many shots on a high probability area that doesn't pan out. The probabilities we've generated are highly correlated to the probabilities of the cells adjacent to them: high probability cells will probably have high probability cells next to them. By adding a bit of randomness, we are slightly less likely to put all our eggs in one basket. There are probably other strategies that would have the same benefits, but adding just a little bit of randomness turned out to be good enough to win.