FEATURED

NASA Center of Excellence for Collaborative Innovation @TopCoder

TopCoder is honored to be a participating vendor of the NASA CoECI!  The CoECI was launched to enable acceleration of US Government implementation of new models of problem solving using collaborative innovation methodologies, such as crowd sourcing and open innovation, to meet agency requirements.  Led by NASA, the CoECI serves as a convening body which harnesses and redistributes the collective experience of all participating federal agencies regarding best practices in collaborative and distributed innovation.

 

Through the CoECI, we hope to bring exciting new challenges and projects in science, healthcare, technology, education and government service to our Community. We will announce new projects here our CoECI TopCoder Network page, so stay tuned!

 

For more information about the CoECI, visit http://www.nasa.gov/offices/COECI/index.html

 

 

LATEST NEWS

Oct
25

CMS Status Report for week ending Oct 26, 2012

Hi All: Hope everyone is well. Here are the highlights for this week:

1. New Risk in terms of missed functionality: the requirement to support dis-enrolling a provider.  This has the potential to negatively impact schedule as we look to include this functionality.

2.  New  issue: To satisfy PT33-NPI requirements there will likely be need to integrate with legacy systems/processes and perform manual processes outside of the system. Complexity risk increased.

3. Large number of upcoming contests in Oct – mid December time-frame will require client time to complete reviews and weigh in on strategic issues.

For more details, see the full report below. If there are any questions, comments or issues, please let us know.
Thanks
Sarah

 

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 25-Oct-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Risks emerging – see details in Risks and Issues section
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 55 contests remaining in Oct – Dec

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Late-Oct

Risk

r1, i2,r6,i6

Administrative Workflow

Mid-Oct

Late-Oct

Stable

r1,i2,r6,i6

UI wireframes (all)

Late-Oct

Stable

r1

Prototype

November

Risk

r1

Bugs

Ongoing

Stable


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Oct 29 – Nov 3:

  • Client (Dan) will be using the milestone feature in Topcoder’s cockpit application to note documentation or assets and the dates they are required by.  Topcoder will review and ensure that the timelines are met.
  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture) and completed assembly contests
    • Review of UI, administrative features and business rules specification contests
    • MN to provide remaining details for integration with MNITS (WSDL)
  • Review proof of concept contest results for JPBM 5 and WAS updates
  • Monitor forums

Nov 4 – 10:

  • Continue review of UI components, architecture and assembly contests
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Oct 22 – Nov 2:

  • TopCoder to propose an integration plan for synchronizing with legacy data sources
  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Create overall site design summary walk-through
  • Ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues.

 

ISSUES and RISKs Summary


Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

r6

Risk: Missed or new requirement to ensure dis-enrollment functionality is present will impact administrative workflow timelines.Action:  Topcoder will expedite inclusion of the missed functionality as best possible (consider use of bug race or other methodology to expedite inclusion)

10-25-12

11-15-12

Open

i6

Risk: To satisfy PT33-NPI requirements there will likely be need to integrate with legacy systems/processes as well as perform manual processes outside of the system (e.g. sending letter cancellation requests, consolidation request fulfillment, etc)Action:  Topcoder to review and ensure nuances and requirements integrated – risk to the timeline due to complexity

10-25-12

11-15-12

Open

i5

Issue: Client is experiencing difficulty downloading UI submissions, in particular wireframes due to their size.Action:  Topcoder will propose a new methodology to facilitate wireframe viewing

10-18-12

10-18-12

Open

r5

Risk:IBM License test requires time to conduct test and review results. If the results are not as expected, a new/alternate strategy/discussions may be requiredAction: Expedite testing by using an IBM copilot to set up smart clouds, enabling POC testing on the IBM stack.

Update: Issue is still unresolved – alternate strategies will be explored in addition to pursuing smart cloud set-up

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

i3

Issue: Client is concerned that feedback to UI wireframes are not being reflected and client is having trouble tracking which wireframes reflect feedback given by Angie.Action:  Topcoder is running short bug races to make wireframe changes.

Update:  Andy to show Dan how to follow bug races in Cockpit.  Topcoder’s James will update the demo box twice weekly with wireframe updates (on a scheduled basis where possible)

09-26-12

10-21-12

Open

r1

Risk: A significant number of new provider organizations have been provided by client in mid-late September timeframe.  As a result the time to complete the UI wireframes that included these new organizational types has increased.Action:  Run the required organizational wireframes contests as aggressively as possible, including in parallel where possible, or with very short periods between contests where parallel is not possible.

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

i4

Issue:Death master file access: will not be available. For development purposes, it will be assumed that a file will be uploaded weekly or monthly and a webservice utilized to process the file.  A simple screen interface will be created to facilitate the upload. 

10-11-12

10-15-12

CLosed

r3

Risk: Topcoder is currently experiencing technical difficulties with the software that allows for downloading of judging bundle packages. Action:Topcoder staff are working on getting the issue resovled with highest priority.Update: Judging bundles are now available for download

09-20-12

10-03-12

Closed

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for IBM assets requiredAction:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress 07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

r2

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rdsites to check for licensing and other authorization information Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) are looking into getting API access.

Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post, etc

 

 

 

07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategy required on IBM stack vs. generic stackResolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

2

Actual contest cost to date: $358,000

Budget on Track as Expected

 

Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Oct 7 -  Oct 22)
  • Storyboard and UI frame contests completed
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  • IBM test stack – co-pilot search continued
  • Specification contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases

 

Oct
18

CMS Status Report for week of Oct 18, 2012

Hi All: Highlights for this week include:

1. Client is experiencing difficulties downloading wireframe submissions.  Topcoder to come up with an alternate methodology to facilitate viewing
2.  Client to use the milestone feature in Topcoder’s Direct application to enter key milestones for producing assets and documents for required elements
3. Topcoder to show client how to view bug race progress in Direct
4. Alternate strategies to be pursued in addition to smart cloud set-up

For the full report, see below.  If there are questions or concerns, please let us know.

Thanks

Sarah

 

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 18-Oct-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Risks emerging – see details in Risks and Issues section
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 55 contests remaining in Oct – Dec

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Late-Oct

Risk

r1, i2

Administrative Workflow

Mid-Oct

Stable

r1,i2

UI wireframes (all)

Late-Oct

Stable

r1

Prototype

November

Risk

r1

Bugs

Ongoing

Stable


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Oct 22 – Nov 2:

  • Client (Dan) will be using the milestone feature in Topcoder’s cockpit application to note documentation or assets and the dates by which they are required.  Topcoder will review and ensure that the timelines are met.
  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture) and completed assembly contests
    • Review of UI, administrative features and business rules specification contests
    • MN to provide details for integration with MNITS (WSDL)
    • WSDL for NetStudy
  • Monitor forums

Nov 3 – Nov 9:

  • Continue review of UI components, architecture and assembly contests
  • Review proof of concept contest results for JPBM 5 and WAS updates (at risk – see r5) – we continue to have difficulty getting the right resource
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Oct 22 – Nov 2:

  • Topcoder to propose a new methodology by which client (Angie) can download wireframes (i5)
  • TopCoder to propose an integration plan for synchronizing with legacy data sources
  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Create overall site design summary walk-through
  • Ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues.

 

ISSUES and RISKs Summary


Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

i5

Issue: Client is experiencing difficulty downloading UI submissions, in particular wireframes due to their size.Action:  Topcoder will propose a new methodology to facilitate wireframe download and viewing

10-18-12

10-25-12

Open

r5

Risk:IBM License test requires time to conduct test and review results. If the results are not as expected, a new/alternate strategy/discussions may be requiredAction: Expedite testing by using an IBM copilot to set up smart clouds, enabling POC testing on the IBM stack.

Update: Issue is still unresolved – alternate strategies will be explored in addition to pursuing smart cloud set-up

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

i3

Issue: Client is concerned that feedback to UI wireframes are not being reflected and client is having trouble tracking which wireframes reflect feedback given by Angie.Action:  Topcoder is running short bug races to make wireframe changes.

Update:  Andy to show Dan how to follow bug races in Cockpit.  Topcoder’s James will update the demo box twice weekly with wireframe updates (on a scheduled basis where possible)

09-26-12

10-21-12

Open

r1

Risk: A significant number of new provider organizations have been provided by client in mid-late September timeframe.  As a result the time to complete the UI wireframes that included these new organizational types has increased.Action:  Run the required organizational wireframes contests as aggressively as possible, including in parallel where possible, or with very short periods between contests where parallel is not possible.

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

i4

Issue:Death master file access: will not be available. For development purposes, it will be assumed that a file will be uploaded weekly or monthly and a webservice utilized to process the file.  A simple screen interface will be created to facilitate the upload. 

10-11-12

10-15-12

CLosed

r3

Risk: Topcoder is currently experiencing technical difficulties with the software that allows for downloading of judging bundle packages. Action:Topcoder staff are working on getting the issue resovled with highest priority.Update: Judging bundles are now available for download

09-20-12

10-03-12

Closed

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for IBM assets requiredAction:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress 07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

r2

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rdsites to check for licensing and other authorization information Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) are looking into getting API access.

Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post, etc

 

 

 

07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategy required on IBM stack vs. generic stackResolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

-  Estimated forecast for Oct – Nov: $170,000

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $325,000

Budget on Track as Expected

 

Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Sept 21 -  Oct 7)
  • Storyboard and UI frame contests completed
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  • IBM test stack – co-pilot search continued
  • Specification contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases

 

 

-

 

Oct
12

CMS Status Report for week of Oct 11, 2012

Hi All: Hope everyone is well.  Highlights for this week include:
1.  Upcoming architecture, UI and assembly contest results for client to review
2.  Client to provide details for integration with MNITS
3.  Since death master SS file not available for coding purposes, alternate strategy (described in issue 2 below) will be pursued.
4. Topcoder to propose integration plan for synchronizing with legacy data sources.

See full report below. If there are questions or comments, please let us know.
Thanks
Sarah

 

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 11-Oct-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Risks emerging – see details in Risks and Issues section
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 20 contests remaining in Oct – Nov

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Mid-Oct

Late-Oct

Risk

r1, i2

Administrative Workflow

Early-Oct

Mid-Oct

Stable

r1,i2

UI wireframes (all)

Mid-October

Late-Oct

Stable

r1

Prototype

October

November

Risk

r1

Bugs

Ongoing

Stable


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Oct 15 – Oct 26:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture) and completed assembly contests
    • Review of UI updated wireframes, administrative features and business rules specification contests
    • MN to provide details for integration with MNITS
  • Monitor forums

Oct 27– Nov 2:

  • Continue review of UI components, architecture and assembly contests
  • Review proof of concept contest results for JPBM 5 and WAS updates (at risk – see r5)
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Oct 15 – Oct 26:

  • TC to propose an integration plan for synchronizing with legacy data sources
  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Create overall site design summary walk-through
  • Ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues.

 


ISSUES and RISKs Summary


Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

i2

Issue:Death master file access: will not be available. For development purposes, it will be assumed that a file will be uploaded weekly or monthly and a webservice utilized to process the file.  A simple screen interface will be created to facilitate the upload. 

10-11-12

r5

Risk:IBM License test requires time to conduct test and review results. If the results are not as expected, a new/alternate strategy/discussions may be requiredAction: Expedite testing by using an IBM copilot to set up smart clouds, enabling POC testing on the IBM stack.

Update: Issue is still unresolved – alternate strategies will be explored in addition to pursuing smart cloud set-up

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

i3

Issue: Client is concerned that feedback to UI wireframes are not being reflected in the final product (there are items to be removed).Action:  Topcoder plans to run a series of short bug races to make the required changes.  The changes expected to be completed in the next two weeks, and will be available for review then.

Update: Bug races in progress or complete

09-26-12

10-08-12

Open

r1

Risk: A significant number of new provider organizations have been provided by client in mid-late September timeframe.  As a result the time to complete the UI wireframes that included these new organizational types has increased.Action:  Run the required organizational wireframes contests as aggressively as possible, including in parallel where possible, or with very short periods between contests where parallel is not possible.

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

r3

Risk: Topcoder is currently experiencing technical difficulties with the software that allows for downloading of judging bundle packages. Action:Topcoder staff are working on getting the issue resovled with highest priority.Update: Judging bundles are now available for download

09-20-12

10-03-12

Closed

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for IBM assets requiredAction:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress 07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

r2

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other authorization information.  Also concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rdparty external site. Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) are looking into getting API access.

Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post, etc

 

 

 

07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategy required on IBM stack vs. generic stackResolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

-  Estimated forecast for Oct – Nov: $150,000

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $320,000

Budget on Track as Expected

 

Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Sept 21 -  Oct 7)
  • Storyboard and UI frame contests completed
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  • IBM test stack – co-pilot search continued
  • Specification contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases

 

Oct
05

Medicaid PESP Status Report – Oct 4 2012

Hi All:  Highlights from this week include:

1. High Risk Item: We do not yet have IBM smart cloud set-up.  We may want to begin looking at alternate strategies while we pursue the smart-cloud set-up.

2. Thirteen plus assemblies have recently been completed and will be ready for review by client.

3. A number of UI wireframes and prototype contests results will be available in the coming week or two, for review by client.

4. Judging bundle issue is sufficiently resolved to allow topcoder to send result files to client.

Please see full report below for details. If there are any questions or comments, please let us know.

Thanks
Sarah

 

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 04-Oct-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Risks emerging – see details in Risks and Issues section
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 25 contests remaining in Sept – Oct

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Mid-Oct

Risk

r1

Administrative Workflow

Early-Oct

Stable

r1

UI wireframes (all)

Mid-October

Stable

r1

Prototype

October

Stable

Bugs

Ongoing

Stable

 


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Oct 7– Oct 21:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture) and completed assembly contests
    • Review of UI prototype, updated wireframes, administrative features and business rules specification contests
    • Discuss timing and skill set of client resources required to support review of architecture proposal to send and retrieve data from mainframe.
  • Monitor forums

Oct 21– Oct 28:

  • Continue review of UI components (storyboards and prototype), architecture and assembly contests
  • Review proof of concept contest results for JPBM 5 and WAS updates (at risk – see r5)
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Oct 7– Oct 21:

  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Create overall site design summary walk-through
  • Ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues.

 


ISSUES and RISKs Summary


Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

r5

Risk: IBM License test requires time to conduct test and review results. If the results are not as expected, a new/alternate strategy/discussions may be required

Action: Expedite testing by using an IBM copilot to set up smart clouds, enabling POC testing on the IBM stack.

Update: Issue is still unresolved – alternate strategies will be explored in addition to pursuing smart cloud set-up

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

i3

Issue: Client is concerned that feedback to UI wireframes are not being reflected in the final product (there are items to be removed).

Action:  Topcoder plans to run a series of short bug races to make the required changes.  The changes expected to be completed in the next two weeks, and will be available for review then.

09-26-12

10-08-12

Open

r1

Risk: A significant number of new provider organizations have been provided by client in mid-late September timeframe.  As a result the time to complete the UI wireframes that included these new organizational types has increased.

Action:  Run the required organizational wireframes contests as aggressively as possible, including in parallel where possible, or with very short periods between contests where parallel is not possible.

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

r3

Risk: Topcoder is currently experiencing technical difficulties with the software that allows for downloading of judging bundle packages. Action: Topcoder staff are working on getting the issue resovled with highest priority.

Update: Judging bundles are now available for download

09-20-12

10-03-12

Closed

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for IBM assets required

Action:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress

 

07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

r2

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other authorization information.  Also concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rd party external site.

 Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) are looking into getting API access.

Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post, etc

 

 

 

 

07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategy required on IBM stack vs. generic stack

Resolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

-  Estimated forecast for Sept – Oct: $85,000

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $295,581

Budget on Track as Expected

 

Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Sept 14 -  Sept 28)
  • Multiple assembly (13) and two specification contests completed
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  • IBM test stack – co
  • Specification contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases

 

NASA Tournament Lab & TopCoder Launch Big Data Challenge Series for U.S. Government Agencies

 

Ideation Competitions Seek New Solutions to Integrate Information Across Fields of Health, Energy and Earth Sciences

 

Orlando, Fla., October 3, 2012 – TopCoder®, Inc., the world’s largest competitive Community of digital creators today announced the launch of the Big Data Challenge – a series of ideation competitions hosted through the NASA Tournament Lab (NTL) to create mobile applications that integrate across multiple United States agencies data repositories related to the field of health, energy and earth sciences. Competitors will be tasked with imagining tools and techniques that find new value hidden in discrete government information domains and then describing how they may be shared as universal, cross-agency solutions that transcend the limitations of individual silos. Registration is open today through 10/13/2012 for the Ideation Challenge phase, the first of four idea generation competitions in the series. For full competition details and registration visit:

http://community.topcoder.com/coeci/nitrd

 

Sponsored by the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development program, (NITRD), the Big Data Challenge series is a partnership between NASA, the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy (DoE), TopCoder and Harvard Business School. The goal of the series is to apply the process of Open Innovation (OI) to conceptualizing novel approaches to extracting value from the  huge information sets residing in various agency silos and delivering impactful value while remaining consistent with individual agency missions.

 

The opportunity to contribute to a matter of national importance draws many individuals and teams from diverse fields within the general public, so beyond cash prizes are the rewards of peer recognition and the satisfaction that comes with making a real impact on a significant challenge.

 

The TopCoder Open Innovation platform and process allows U.S. government agencies to conduct high risk/high reward challenges in an open and transparent environment with predictable cost, measurable outcomes-based results and the potential to move quickly into unanticipated directions and new areas of software technology. Big data is a term applied to data sets whose size is beyond the ability of commonly used software tools to capture, manage and process the data within a tolerable elapsed time. Big data sizes are a constantly moving target currently ranging from a few dozen terabytes to many petabytes of data in a single data set.

 

“The TopCoder platform for Open Innovation is the most sophisticated platform of its kind available today in the digital space,” said Rob Hughes, President and COO of TopCoder, Inc. “Matched with the power and talent of the TopCoder Community, we look forward to seeing new value created out of existing government big data that will manifest itself in new tools and services for both American consumers and industry.”

 

The TopCoder platform supports the entire end-to-end digital creation lifecycle – from idea conception to implementation and support through a true collaborative open innovation model.  Almost any type of content, application, algorithm or digital asset can be built entirely through the platform – whether a standalone mobile app through to enhancements or additions to large, existing enterprise systems to the development of entirely new cloud based offerings for customers to testing and support through small enhancements and bug fixes.  All areas of digital creation are covered through one easy to use cloud based Innovation as a Platform (IaaP) offering accessing TopCoder’s renowned community of over 425,000 members – from business analysis to creative asset creation, analytics and sophisticated processes for API, software design and development as well as digital content.

 

About NASA Tournament Lab

NASA and Harvard University have established the NASA Tournament Lab (NTL), which with the enabling capabilities of the TopCoder community allow for competitions to create the most innovative, most efficient, and most optimized solutions for specific, real-world challenges being faced by NASA researchers. The NTL provides an online virtual facility for NASA researchers with a computational or complex data processing challenge to “order” a solution, just like they would order laboratory tests or supplies. Learn more at the official NTL Website.

 

About NITRD

The Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) Program is the Nation’s primary source of Federally funded revolutionary breakthroughs in advanced information technologies such as computing, networking, and software. A unique collaboration of Federal research and development agencies, the NITRD Program seeks to:

• Provide research and development foundations for assuring continued U.S. technological leadership in advanced networking, computing systems, software, and associated information technologies

• Provide research and development foundations for meeting the needs of the Federal government for advanced networking, computing systems, software, and associated information technologies

• Accelerate development and deployment of these technologies in order to maintain world leadership in science and engineering; enhance national defense and national and homeland security; improve U.S. productivity and competitiveness and promote long-term economic growth; improve the health of the U.S. citizenry; protect the environment; improve education, training, and lifelong learning; and improve the quality of life.

 

The NITRD Program stems from the High-Performance Computing (HPC) Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-194) as amended by the Next Generation Internet Research Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-305). These laws authorize Federal agencies to set goals, prioritize their investments, and coordinate their activities in networking and information technology research and development.

 

About TopCoder, Inc.

TopCoder is the world’s largest Open Innovation Community of digital creators with more than 425,000 members representing algorithmists, software developers and creative artists from over 200 countries. The TopCoder Open Innovation Community creates digital assets including analytics, software and creative designs and solutions for a wide-ranging client base through a competitive, rigorous, standards based methodology. Combined with our extremely talented community this groundbreaking methodology results in superior outcomes for our clients. For more information about sponsoring TopCoder events and utilizing TopCoder’s software services and platforms, visit www.topcoder.com.

 

TopCoder is a registered trademark of TopCoder, Inc. in the United States and other countries. All other product and company names herein may be trademarks of their respective owners.

 

Sep
28

Medicaid PESP Status Report – Sept 27, 2012

Hi All: Hope everyone is having a good week.  Highlights for the week include:

1. Risk to the timeline due to the late provision of a significant number of provider organizations added recently.

2.  Topcoder is actively working to fix the judging bundle download issue, that is slowing down our ability to share final assembly (and other large contest files) with client.

3.  IBM license test suite requires significant time to build and test POC.  As well, there is always the possibility that the tests will show that further design/build work is required.

4.  UI wireframes do not yet reflect changes requested by client to remove items.  These changes will be made in the next 1-2 weeks via short bug races.

5.  There are a relatively large number of contests running in Sept and Oct that will require client and topcoder input jointly.

For the full report, please see below.  If you have any questions or comments, please let us know.
Thanks
Sarah

 

 

Project Status Report

Project   Name: Prepared   by: Period   Ending:
Medicaid Provider   Screening Portal Sarah   Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 27-Sep-12


Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  •   On track   to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  •   On track
Schedule
  •   Risks emerging – see details in Risks and Issues section
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 25 contests remaining in Sept – Oct

Upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow   for All Providers

Mid-Oct

Stable

r1

Administrative   Workflow

Early-Oct

Stable

r1

UI wireframes (all)

Mid-October

Stable

r1

Prototype

October

Stable

Bugs

Ongoing

Stable


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Sep 28 – Oct 14:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module         (architecture) and integrated external sources assembly contests
    • Review of UI prototype and updated         wireframes
    • Review of Administrative features         and business rules specification contests
    • Discuss timing and skill set of         client resources required to support review of architecture proposal to         send and retrieve data from mainframe.
  • Monitor forums

Oct 14– Oct 21:

  • Continue review of UI components        (storyboards and prototype), architecture and assembly contests
  • Review proof of concept contest        results for JPBM 5 and WAS updates
  • Continue discussion on open issues.
Work Required –   Topcoder
Sep 28 – Oct 14:

  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Create        overall site design summary walk-through
  • Ensure client        SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve        outstanding questions and issues.

 

 ISSUES and RISKs Summary

Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

i3

Issue: Client is   concerned that feedback to UI wireframes are not being reflected in the final   product (there are items to be removed).Action:  Topcoder plans to run a series of short bug   races to make the required changes.    The changes expected to be completed in the next two weeks, and will   be available for review then.

09-26-12

10-08-12

Open

r1

Risk: A significant   number of new provider organizations have been provided by client in mid-late   September timeframe.  As a result the   time to complete the UI wireframes that included these new organizational   types has increased.Action:  Run the required organizational wireframes   contests as aggressively as possible, including in parallel where possible,   or with very short periods between contests where parallel is not possible.

09-20-12

10-21-12

Open

r3

Risk:Topcoder is currently experiencing technical   difficulties with the software that allows for downloading of judging bundle packages.   In particular assembly contests results are affected.  It is slowing down our ability to provide   the client with the assembly contests results to reviewAction: Topcoder staff are working on getting the issue   resovled with highest priority. 

09-20-12

09-20-12

Open

r5

Risk:IBM License test requires time to conduct test and   review results. If the results are not as expected, a new/alternate   strategy/discussions may be requiredAction: Expedite testing by using an IBM copilot to set up   smart clouds, enabling POC testing on the IBM stack.

09-20-12

01-21-12

Open

i2

Issue:  Strategy to   address licensing for IBM assets requiredAction:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by   client.  Creation on contest to port   elements to IBM stack in progress 07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

r2

Issue:  Developers   require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other   authorization information.  Also concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rdparty external site. Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies   respectively) are looking into getting API access.Alternate:  Create  well-formatted   private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring   tokens, post, etc 07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategy   required on IBM stack vs. generic stackResolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world”   applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to   port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

-  Estimated   forecast for Sept – Oct: $95,000

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $266,595

Budget   on Track as Expected

 

Completed Activities

Completed   Activities (Sept 14 -  Sept 28)
  •   Multiple   assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  •   Specification   contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases

Sep
21

Medicaid PESP Status Report – Sept 20, 2012

Hi all:  Here are the highlights for this week:

1. Upcoming assembly and architecture contest results for review
2. Review by client of ERD diagram
3. Upcoming review of UI prototype (full set)

For full report, see below.
Thanks and have a great week.
Sarah

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 20-Sep-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Architecture, UI and Assembly contests on track
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 30 contests to be launched Sept – Oct

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Early Sep

Stable

 r1

Administrative Workflow

Early Sep

Stable

UI wireframes (all)

Mid-October

Stable

Prototype

October

Stable

Bug Races

Ongoing

Stable


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Sep 21 – Oct 7:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture)
    • Review of integrated external sources assembly contests
    • Review of UI prototype (full set)
    • Review of Administrative features and business rules specification contests
    • Discuss timing and skill set of client resources required to support review of architecture proposal to send and retrieve data from mainframe
  • Monitor forums

Oct 7– Oct 14:

  • Continue review of UI components (storyboards and prototype), architecture and assembly contests
  • Review proof of concept contest results for JPBM 5 and WAS updates
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Sep 21 – Oct 7:

  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Continue running specification contests based on existing provider types and administrative features to document use cases and activities as well as IBM tech stack contests
  • Create overall site design summary walk-through
  • Continue contest to distill business rules from conceptualization documents to date
  • Ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues

 

 ISSUES and RISKs Summary

Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

r1

Risk: There are a large number of workflows to complete in a relatively short time period and they are dependent on key UI wireframe componentsAction:  Ensure wireframe competitions are completed as soon as possible to reduce dependency riskUpdate: Wireframes review in progress and on track to early Sep

07-26-12

Open

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for required IBM assets requiredAction:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress

 

07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

 

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other authorization information.  Related to that are concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rdparty external site. Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) have started looking into getting API access.  For now, the recommended alternate will be used (see below).Recommended Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post (or alternate methodology) 07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategic direction required on fully Loaded IBM stack vs. generic stackResolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

 

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

-  Estimated forecast for Sept – Oct: $100,000

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $261,000

Budget on Track as Expected

 Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Sept 7 -  Sept 21)
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  • Specification contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases

 

 

 

Sep
13

Medicaid PESP Status Report – Sept 13, 2012

Hi All:   Here are the highlights from this week:

1. Review of architecture service module and assembly contests by client.
2. Continue to provide outstanding organizational provider types  and provide a timetable for delivery of definitions/associated pdf forms for remaining types
3.  Multiple architecture, assembly and UI contests in progress at topcoder

See full report below.  If there are any questions or concerns, please let us know.

Thanks
Sarah

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 13-Sep-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Architecture, UI and Assembly contests on track
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 30 contests to be launched Sept – Oct

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Early Sep

Stable

 r1

IBM Tech Stack Selection & Licensing

Early Sep

Stable

i2

Administrative Workflow

Early Sep

Stable

Prototype

October

Stable

Bug Races

Ongoing

 

Stable

 


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Sep 14 – Sep 28:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture)
    • Review of assembly contests (external sources integration – multiple providers): 8 contests
    • Provide a timetable for delivery of the definitions of the remaining types (or current pdf forms in use)
    • Discuss timing and skill set of client resources required to support review of architecture proposal to send and retrieve data from mainframe
  • Monitor forums

Sep 28 – Oct 7:

  • Continue review of UI components (storyboards and prototype), architecture and assembly contests
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Sep 14 – Sep 28:

  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Run on IBM tech stack version contest
  • Run specification contests based on existing provider types and administrative features to document use cases and activities
  • Create overall site design summary walk-through
  • Distill business rules from conceptualization documents to date
  • Ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues

 

 ISSUES and RISKs Summary

Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

r1

Risk: There are a large number of workflows to complete in a relatively short time period and they are dependent on key UI wireframe components

Action:  Ensure wireframe competitions are completed as soon as possible to reduce dependency risk

Update: Wireframes review in progress and on track to early Sep

07-26-12

Open

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for required IBM assets required

 

Action:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress

 

07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

 

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other authorization information.  Related to that are concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rd party external site.

 Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) have started looking into getting API access.  For now, the recommended alternate will be used (see below).

Recommended Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post (or alternate methodology)

07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategic direction required on fully Loaded IBM stack vs. generic stack

Resolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

 

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

- Estimated forecast for Sept (architecture, assembly & UI contests in draft): $100,000

- Estimated forecast for Sept – Oct (prototype, migration to IBM stack and assembly contests): $150,000

 

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $161,527

Budget on Track as Expected


Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Aug 30 -  Sept 14)
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  • Specification contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases

 

Sep
06

Medicaid PESP Status Report – Sept 6, 2012

Hi All: Hope that everyone had a good long weekend.  Here are the highlights from this week:

1. Review of architecture service module by client
2. Review of results of external screening resources assembly contests by client (8 contests)
3. Client to provide list of remaining organizational provider types (40+) and provide a timetable for delivery of definitions of these remaining types
4.  TC to run contest to port requirements elements to IBM stack.
5. TC to run key specification, assembly, architecture and UI contests

See full report below.  If there are any questions or concerns, please let us know.

Thanks
Sarah

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 06-Sep-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Architecture, UI and Assembly contests on track
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 30 contests to be launched Sept – Oct

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Aug: 4th  week

Early Sep

Stable

 r1

IBM Tech Stack Selection & Licensing

Early Sep

Stable

i2

Administrative Workflow

Early Sep

Stable

Prototype

October

Stable

Bug Races

Ongoing

 

Stable

 


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Sep 7 – Sep 21:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture)
    • Review of assembly contests (external sources integration – multiple providers): 8 contests
    • Continue review of wireframes and storyboard workflows as required
    • Provide a list of the remaining provider types (organizational types): 40+ types remaining
    • Provide a timetable for delivery of the definitions of the remaining types
  • Monitor forums

Sep 21 – Sep 28:

  • Continue review of UI components (storyboards and prototype), architecture and assembly contests
  • Discuss timing and skill set of client resources required to support review of architecture proposal to send and retrieve data from mainframe
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Sep 7 – Sep 21:

  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Run on IBM tech stack version contest
  • Run specification contests based on existing provider types and administrative features to document use cases and activities
  • Distill business rules from conceptualization documents to date
  • Determine key milestone for completion of major assets and ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to review results
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues

 

 ISSUES and RISKs Summary

Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

r1

Risk: There are a large number of workflows to complete in a relatively short time period and they are dependent on key UI wireframe components

Action:  Ensure wireframe competitions are completed as soon as possible to reduce dependency risk

Update: Wireframes review in progress and on track to early Sep

07-26-12

Open

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for required IBM assets required

 

Action:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress

 

07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

 

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other authorization information.  Related to that are concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rd party external site.

 Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) have started looking into getting API access.  For now, the recommended alternate will be used (see below).

Recommended Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post (or alternate methodology)

07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategic direction required on fully Loaded IBM stack vs. generic stack

Resolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

 Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

- Estimated forecast for Sept (architecture, assembly & UI contests in draft): $120,000

- Estimated forecast for Sept – Oct (prototype, migration to IBM stack and assembly contests): $150,000

 

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $125,600

Budget on Track as Expected


Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Aug 23 – Aug 30)
  • External sources (parts 1, 2,3, 4 & 5) architecture contests completed
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests in review or approvals stage
  • Round 2 of storyboard and wireframes created in draft

 

Aug
30

Medicaid PESP Status Report – Aug 30, 2012

Hi All: This week’s highlights include the following high-priority items:

1. Continue review of wireframe and storyboards as needed

2. Continue discussions on porting of generic stack to IBM stack as well as IBM licensing issues

3.  Review external sources assembly competition results (6-8 competitions finishing over the next 2 weeks and expected to be provided for client feedback)

4. Review results of services architecture module

5. Monitor forums

Thanks
Sarah (polgara)

Full Project Status Report:

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 30-Aug-12
 
Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Architecture, UI and Assembly contests on track
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 30 contests to be launched Sept – Oct

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary      

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Aug: 4th  week

Moderate Risk

 r1

IBM Tech Stack Selection & Licensing

Early Sep

Stable

i2

Administrative Workflow

Early Sep

Stable

3rd Party Screening Asset Integration

Aug: 4th  week

Stable

Prototype

October

Stable

Bug Races

Ongoing

Stable

 

Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Aug 30-Sep 14:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture)
    • Review of assembly contests (external sources integration – multiple providers): 8 contests
    • Continue review of wireframes and storyboard workflows
    • Review updated system architecture, open source stack & determine elements to be ported to IBM stack and continue discussions on licensing for IBM assets
  • Monitor forums

Sep 14 – Sep 28:

  • Continue review of UI components (storyboards and prototype)
  • Continue review of architecture and assembly contests as required
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Aug 30 – Sep 14:

  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress. Focus is on general service architecture, screening rules focus and early draft work on prototype
  • Creation of multiple architecture contests (screening rules focus), assembly and early draft of prototype contest
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues

 

 ISSUES and RISKs Summary

Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

r1

RiskThere are a large number of workflows to complete in a relatively short time period and they are dependent on key UI wireframe components Action:  Ensure wireframe competitions are completed as soon as possible to reduce dependency riskUpdate: Wireframes review in progress

 

07-26-12

Open

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for required IBM assets requiredAction:  Discussions underway with client.  Client provided with updated system architecture. Discussions underway  07-26-12

08-31-12

Open

 

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other authorization information.  Related to that are concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rdparty external site. Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) have started looking into getting API access.  For now, the recommended alternate will be used (see below).Recommended Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post (or alternate methodology) 07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategic direction required on fully Loaded IBM stack vs. generic stackResolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

 

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

- Estimated forecast for Sept (architecture, assembly & UI contests in draft): $120,000- Estimated forecast for Sept – Oct (prototype, migration to IBM stack and assembly contests): $150,000

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $103,208

Budget on Track as Expected

  

Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Aug 2 – Aug 16)
  • External sources (parts 1, 2,3, 4 & 5) architecture contests completed
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Wireframes (round 1) and storyboard (round 1) feedback provided; changes and follow-up in progress