Sep
21

Medicaid PESP Status Report – Sept 20, 2012

Hi all:  Here are the highlights for this week:

1. Upcoming assembly and architecture contest results for review
2. Review by client of ERD diagram
3. Upcoming review of UI prototype (full set)

For full report, see below.
Thanks and have a great week.
Sarah

Project Status Report

Project Name: Prepared by: Period Ending:
Medicaid Provider Screening Portal Sarah Ramkissoon/Andy LaMora 20-Sep-12

Executive Summary

Item Comments
Overall
  • On track to Q4 Implementation
Scope/Quality
  • On track
Schedule
  • Architecture, UI and Assembly contests on track
Budget/Resources
  • On track – see details in budget section
Contest Management
  • On track – approximately 30 contests to be launched Sept – Oct

upcoming Milestones/Deliverables Summary

Project Milestones/Deliverables

Estimated End

Revised  End

Status

Reference

Complete Workflow for All Providers

Early Sep

Stable

 r1

Administrative Workflow

Early Sep

Stable

UI wireframes (all)

Mid-October

Stable

Prototype

October

Stable

Bug Races

Ongoing

Stable


Upcoming Activities

Work Required  - Sponsor
Sep 21 – Oct 7:

  • Requires client time, input and assistance to:
    • Review of Services Module (architecture)
    • Review of integrated external sources assembly contests
    • Review of UI prototype (full set)
    • Review of Administrative features and business rules specification contests
    • Discuss timing and skill set of client resources required to support review of architecture proposal to send and retrieve data from mainframe
  • Monitor forums

Oct 7– Oct 14:

  • Continue review of UI components (storyboards and prototype), architecture and assembly contests
  • Review proof of concept contest results for JPBM 5 and WAS updates
  • Continue discussion on open issues
Work Required – Topcoder
Sep 21 – Oct 7:

  • Multiple architecture, UI, assembly and bug hunt contests in progress
  • Continue running specification contests based on existing provider types and administrative features to document use cases and activities as well as IBM tech stack contests
  • Create overall site design summary walk-through
  • Continue contest to distill business rules from conceptualization documents to date
  • Ensure client SME resource alignment and availability to meet key milestone deadlines
  • Work with client to resolve outstanding questions and issues

 

 ISSUES and RISKs Summary

Ref #

Description

Reported Date

Action By Date

Status

r1

Risk: There are a large number of workflows to complete in a relatively short time period and they are dependent on key UI wireframe componentsAction:  Ensure wireframe competitions are completed as soon as possible to reduce dependency riskUpdate: Wireframes review in progress and on track to early Sep

07-26-12

Open

i2

Issue:  Strategy to address licensing for required IBM assets requiredAction:  Feedback on the elements to port provided by client.  Creation on contest to port elements to IBM stack in progress

 

07-26-12

08-31-12

Closed

 

Issue:  Developers require API access to 3rd sites to check for licensing and other authorization information.  Related to that are concerns where there are expiration dates for licenses, licensing information is not available or if there is use of CAPTCH or other technologies that prevent easy reading of data on the 3rdparty external site. Update (Aug 16, 2012):  MN DHS and CMS (state and federal health agencies respectively) have started looking into getting API access.  For now, the recommended alternate will be used (see below).Recommended Alternate:  Create  well-formatted private web pages that allows for screen-scraping, and query with querystring tokens, post (or alternate methodology) 07-26-12

08-23-12

Closed

i1

Issue:  Strategic direction required on fully Loaded IBM stack vs. generic stackResolution: Build two POCs ( “hello world” applications) and implement open source stack version.  Client will then prioritize elements to port to the IBM stack

07-12-12

07-31-12

 Closed

 

Project budget update  

Ref #

Description

Comments

1

-  Estimated forecast for Sept – Oct: $100,000

n/a

2

Actual contest cost to date: $261,000

Budget on Track as Expected

 Completed Activities

Completed Activities (Sept 7 -  Sept 21)
  • Multiple assembly, UI, architecture and bug hunt contests launched or in review
  • Specification contests launched to determine business rules and document use cases